![]() Crazy thing is, it's being debated by peeps with their own class specific sets. Blizz produced class sets and there seems to be no debate with the exception of this set. So again, the items stats further prove that this set is warlock based. Can a lock stand toe to toe with a true melee class? Hell no, not in pvp, but in questing, combined with a VW and curses, a warlock can strike and damage very well while preserving mana. Firestone: enchants the main hand weapon with fire for melee. ![]() Check out the spells and combat senarios for locks. Finally, the statement about the set having agility and strength makes this a non-warlock set is ignorant. There's one simple reason for that, I'm playing my class as it was designed, and priests that feel they can combat instead of heal are seriously misguided. The priest's only chance of survival when it encounters me is to run. I'm always at the top of the list for killing blows, and quite frankly, I eat priests and mages for lunch on a regular basis. Locks have numerous specialty spells that are very handy and some are vital to survival in a raid. I do as much or more damage than most mages. Secondly, to say that a lock is useless is insane. Healing priests and mages should only roll against each other, never against the beforementioned classes. If a lock isnt present or doesnt need it, shadow priests should get the next shot at it. Shadow priests can certainly benefit from it, but not as much as a lock can. ![]() Comentado por ThottbotFirst of all, this is a warlock set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |